An SAT micro-topic explainer. Free to read — no account needed.
Reframing means rewriting what you are given so it lines up with what you need to find. Instead of grinding through a direct solution, you reshape the expression or equation. A few standard moves cover most cases.
One move is to rewrite an expression so a needed piece appears. To express 2x+7 in terms of (x+3), build from 2(x+3)=2x+6. Then 2x+7=2(x+3)+1.
Another move is to treat a whole chunk as a single variable. In −22x−3+3−2x=4, let m=3−2x, so 2x−3=−m. The equation becomes −2−m+m=4, which is far simpler.
You can also combine given equations to produce exactly what is asked. To find m2+n2−2mn from m2+3mn=5 and n2−5mn=12, add them. The result m2+n2−2mn=17 is the expression you wanted, without ever finding m or n.
Worked examples
Rewrite 3x+10 in terms of (x+2). \ Since 3(x+2)=3x+6, that is 4 less than 3x+10. \ So 3x+10=3(x+2)+4.
Given a+2b=7 and a−b=1, find 2a+b without solving for a and b. \ Add the two equations: (a+2b)+(a−b)=7+1. \ This gives 2a+b=8.
Solve (x+1)2−5(x+1)+6=0 by letting u=x+1. \ The equation becomes u2−5u+6=0, which factors as (u−2)(u−3)=0, so u=2 or u=3. \ Since u=x+1, we get x=1 or x=2.
Is this one of the topics costing you points?
Take the free 10-question diagnostic for a predicted SAT score and a breakdown of which domains are costing you points.