Graphing lines for linear inequalities

An SAT Math micro-topic under Graphs of linear systems and inequalities (Algebra). Free to read — no account needed.

Graphing a linear inequality has two parts: draw the boundary line, then shade a whole region. For the boundary, pretend the sign is == and graph that line, which splits the plane into two halves.
linear_inequality_shade.png
In the figure the boundary line y=2x+3y = 2x + 3 is drawn and the region for y≤2x+3y \le 2x + 3 is shaded. Testing (0,0)(0, 0): 0≤30 \le 3 is true, so the origin lies in the solution — confirming we shade the side that contains it.
Make the boundary solid when equality is allowed (≤\le, ≥\ge), because those points on the line count as solutions, and dashed for strict inequalities (<<, >>), because the line itself is excluded.
To decide which side to shade, pick any point not on the line — (0,0)(0, 0) is easiest whenever the line misses the origin — and substitute it into the inequality. If it comes out true, shade that side; if false, shade the other side.

Worked examples

Graph y>5y > 5.
Draw the horizontal line y=5y = 5, dashed because the inequality is strict.
Shade above it, since y>5y > 5 means every point with yy-coordinate greater than 55.
ineq_ex1_ygt5.png
Which side do you shade for −2x+4y≥8-2x + 4y \ge 8?
Draw the solid line −2x+4y=8-2x + 4y = 8. Test (0,0)(0, 0): −2(0)+4(0)=0-2(0) + 4(0) = 0, and 0≥80 \ge 8 is false.
Since (0,0)(0, 0) fails, shade the side that does not contain the origin.
ineq_ex2_shade.png
Is (6,4)(6, 4) a solution to y>5y > 5?
Substitute the yy-coordinate: 4>54 > 5 is false.
So (6,4)(6, 4) is not a solution — it lies outside the shaded region.
ineq_ex3_point.png

Is this one of the topics costing you points?

Take the free 10-question diagnostic for a predicted SAT score and a breakdown of which domains are costing you points.

Predict your SAT score →

More in Graphs of linear systems and inequalities